Is this the True Face of #QAnon? #Q #GreatAwakening #NEONREVOLT

What’s this?

ANOTHER #NEONREVOLT article in just under 24 hours?

Well, I had to, guys, I just had to!

Because… I think the #Anon here might just be on to something.

But before we get into that, if you somehow missed the previous article, PLEASE READ IT AND SHARE ACROSS TWITTER! IT’S INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT!

And with every retweet it gets, the official @IATSE Twitter account gets pinged, so they will SEE, tangibly SEE the support they have.

Seriously, just go run a search on the hashtags appended to this article to see the kind of tremendous support they’ve already received. But it can still get MUCH LOUDER, and that’s what I would like to see!

#iatsewalkout hashtag on Twitter

See Tweets about #iatsewalkout on Twitter. See what people are saying and join the conversation.

Okay, let’s get into it!

Now, for those unfamiliar with the way the Research boards work, every Anon gets an ID when posting and that ID remains associated with that Anon for the thread, so other Anons can have an idea if they’re talking to the same person or not.

In other words, its a way of keeping people straight, without ever having to actually know who is talking, and it prevents other people from imitating others (at least, as long as the thread lasts).

And sometimes, one particular Anon will post a string of very interesting ideas, which can all be tracked via their ID, and another Anon will compile all their posts into a “bun.”

Which is exactly what Anon did late last night/early this morning with another Anon’s posts… an Anon who had quite the theory to share, who was subsequently dubbed “#HighIQAnon:”

Essentially, in this series of linked posts, HighIQAnon lays out his theory that Michael Anton is actually #QAnon.

For those unfamiliar, Anton is the former Deputy Assistant to the President for Strategic Communications, and he served in that capacity until April, 2018… (So already we have a “fit” for the kind of role Q plays, in that Anton was in charge of Strategic Communication… just months before QAnon appeared on the scene).

He’s also famous for writing an essay entitled “The Flight 93 Election,” relating the 2016 election to the crew who charged the cockpit on Flight 93, and brought down the plane, rather than have it be used to cause more terror.

The essay is notable as the MSM tried to paint it as a sort of grim, dark intellectual underpinning for “Trumpism,” but most notably, Anton published this essay under the pseudonym Publius Decius Mus, a consul who, following a mysterious vision, willingly laid down his life in battle in order to help save the Roman Republic:

So now we have two points of data that correlate Anton to Q:

1) His role in the White House
2) The use of pseudonyms in his work

Here’s that original article of his that blew up:

The Flight 93 Election

By: Publius Decius Mus September 5, 2016 Publius Decius Mus was the pseudonym of Michael Anton, who in January of 2017 left the private sector to serve on the National Security Council. For his many other writings, visit his Claremont Review of Books author page.

2016 is the Flight 93 election: charge the cockpit or you die. You may die anyway. You—or the leader of your party—may make it into the cockpit and not know how to fly or land the plane. There are no guarantees.

Except one: if you don’t try, death is certain. To compound the metaphor: a Hillary Clinton presidency is Russian Roulette with a semi-auto. With Trump, at least you can spin the cylinder and take your chances.

Sound familiar?

If you’ve been following #QAnon for any length of time, it certainly should by now.

The whole essay is worth reading in its entirety. I’m only just encountering it myself, for the first time here, and I’m reading it and going, “THIS GUY GETS IT!” And he really does!

So let’s add that to our data points:

1) His role in the White House
2) The use of pseudonyms in his work
3) Similar language

And again, note how the MSM responded:

Dark Essays By White House Staffer Are the Intellectual Source Code of Trumpism

Let’s say you are a top official on the National Security Council and Donald Trump requests a memo explaining the purpose of his chaotic presidency. What are the odds you would draft a 4,000-word essay arguing that America is like a doomed aircraft that’s been hijacked by terrorists in which Trump has madly rushed the cockpit and seized the controls but we still might die because he doesn’t know how to fly the plane?

But nobody in the administration has drawn up a real-time ideological blueprint to explain the intentional chaos of what’s happening under Trump — except, as it now turns out, Michael Anton, whose radical theories have been compared to those of a German philosopher named Carl Schmitt, who helped lay the legal foundations of the Nazi Party.

And note, in particular, how Ben Shapiro responded:

One conservative retort, from the writer Ben Shapiro, was bluntly headlined, “The Widely Praised ‘Flight 93 Election’ Essay Is Dishonest and Stupid.” Shapiro described Anton’s essay as “incoherent, mind-numbing horseshit,” faulting him for repeating his noxious points “like a dog licking its own vomit.” Another conservative critique, from Michael Gerson, a former speechwriter for George W. Bush, described the essay as “a master class in overwriting,” and added, “seldom has a pseudonym been more needful to protect an author’s reputation.”

The kind of criticism Anton received actually just serve to illustrate how prescient he was, knowing what we know now, and how he will be completely vindicated in the future:

America’s Leading Authoritarian Is Working for Trump

The most intellectually important essay of the 2016 election cycle, and possibly of the whole political era that has begun, is ” The Flight 93 Election.” Its previously anonymous author turns out to be former Bush administration speechwriter Michael Anton, reports Michael Warren. Anton is now working as a senior national security official in the Trump administration.

If there is a single passage of the essay that most succinctly summarizes its case, it is this: “I want my party to live. I want my country to live. I want my people to live.” Anton equates all these things — his party, his country, and his people, insisting that four more years of a Democratic presidency will extinguish all three. This is a textbook example of the kind of reasoning, the conviction that a single election defeat will usher in permanent destruction, that liberal theorists see as inimical to democratic government.

The Atlantic was actually much more fair to Anton. In particular, they wrote one passage that, if HighIQAnon is right, will go down in history as quite possibly the most ironic thing a news magazine has ever written:

The Populist Nationalist on Trump’s National Security Council

Michael Anton actively courts controversy with his extreme views. But how much influence does he have in the White House?

Whereas the Obama White House displayed the kind of ideological and political uniformity that enabled Rhodes to be a player by channeling the president’s point of view, the Trump White House is a tangle of competing interests and factions. How do you make an echo chamber when it’s not clear what’s supposed to echo? What use is it to be the leading voice of intellectual Trumpism if, at the end of the day, you’re a comms guy, and the strategy and vision are being mapped out elsewhere?

To use a metaphor close to Anton’s heart: The Roman consul he chose for his pseudonym, Publius Decius Mus, sacrificed himself to inspire his army. Which army is ready to follow Anton?

“If Trump empowered Anton the way Obama empowered Rhodes he could do really great things,” said national security consultant David Reaboi, a friend of Anton’s and Claremont fellow. “It’s only a question of, ‘Is this guy empowered enough by the administration to actually do this stuff?’ The answer is, not yet.”

But what if… secretly, Trump actually had empowered him?

It’s a tantalizing theory, no?

Anton gave me a long explanation for his nom de plume, including a point-by-point rundown of the battle of Vesuvius as described by Roman historian Livy, as well as an exegesis of the showdown between Hannibal and Fabius Maximus Cunctator at the Battle of Cannae. But it boils down to this: Anton sees in Decius the embodiment of the ideals of Machiavelli, the thinker who has been his lodestar.

“There was no way to break authority’s hold over philosophy without shock therapy,” Anton said of Machiavelli. “He delivered the shock therapy by all the pungent, obnoxious, outrageous things he says in his books, which makes him forever after known as an evil schemer, the devil incarnate, and so on. He knew that would be his fate. He knew that would be what most people would think of him for all of eternity. He did it anyway. He accepted upon himself the opprobrium of the world, in order to assess what he thought was necessary in the liberation of thought from under the thumb of authority. In that sense, he is decent. He didn’t sacrifice his body, his wealth, his life; but he sacrificed his reputation.”

HighIQAnon continues, and lays out his basic theory here:

I actually… don’t know what the Feb 10th “Ah… so cute!” thing is in reference to (and I’m not sure it’s so important), but the Feb 11th interview can be found here. The video should start at 2:50, but in case it doesn’t, just jump there:

 

Okay, so first, HighIQAnon is saying that we misunderstood the drop here. “The Q” is to be literally understood as “the cue,” not “the Question.” A question will still be involved, and the answer (((WWG1WGA))) will be given, but the “cue” makes more sense here, I think.

And above is the “Let’s Roll” picture #HighIQAnon was talking about in the previous drop…

Some quick background: basically, the story goes that Anton “left” the White House in 2018…

National Security Council spokesman Michael Anton to leave White House

President Trump speaks in the Cabinet Room of the White House in Washington, D.C., on April 3, 2018. (Photo: Olivier Douliery, AFP/Getty Images) National Security Council spokesman Michael Anton announced Sunday he’s leaving the White House to join Hillsdale College’s Kirby Center as a writer and lecturer.

…But requested to come back…

…to cook there…

…in order to help serve dinner to Macron and his wife during their visit.

A National Security Aide’s Departing Wish: Cooking for the State Dinner

WASHINGTON – In the ceaseless churn of the Trump administration, there are many ways to leave the White House. Lt. Gen. H. R. McMaster, the ousted national security adviser, exited to the applause of colleagues who lined the West Wing parking lot.

“I’m a rare thing in Washington conservative circles: a right-wing Francophile,” said Mr. Anton, who first served in the White House during the George W. Bush administration, when the Iraq war curdled relations with Paris. “It makes it a special honor that I didn’t merely cook at the state dinner, but of all people, I cooked for the president of France.”

Riiiiight. He came alllllll that way just because he’s a a big old Frenchie-fan.

Don’t get me wrong, I have no doubt that he’s a very skilled chef. But there has to be more than “he wanted to cook dinner for Macron.”

But let’s add it to our list.

1) His role in the White House
2) The use of pseudonyms in his work
3) Similar language
4) Literal “Baker” bringing the P-A-I-N

HighIQAnon goes on to reiterate his line of thinking more clearly here for everyone:

Here’s the #QDrop before the “Kitchen is HOT” post, followed by the “Kitchen is HOT” post itself.

And HighIQAnon takes it a step further and connects this to #PaleWilly’s post, wherein he helped Doxx the pastry chef working for the Trump at Mar-a-lago.

Trump Employs QAnon Believer as Pastry Chef at Mar-a-Lago

Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort appears to employ a pastry chef who frequently posts online about her belief in the pro-Trump QAnon conspiracy theory. Elizabeth Alfieri, a Florida pastry chef, has posted dozens of times on Instagram using QAnon hashtags and slogans, often using pictures taken at Mar-a-Lago itself.

The implication is that they are actually signalling about another pastry chef working for Trump…

These next few posts are out-of-order, just so you can see the themes HighIQAnon talks about more clearly:

He might.

He helpfully posted the tweet, counting out the words:

Let’s add it to the list:

1) His role in the White House
2) The use of pseudonyms in his work
3) Similar language
4) Literal “Baker” bringing the P-A-I-N
5) Major shout-out from DJT (in other words, still on good terms with POTUS)

Next comes the explanation of the signal from Anton’s book:


And as HighIQAnon points out, and another Anon expands upon above, Anton has written a sort of spoof book as though he were Machiavelli (using yet another pseudonym), all about men’s fashion:

So lets add it to the list:

1) His role in the White House
2) The use of pseudonyms in his work
3) Similar language
4) Literal “Baker” bringing the P-A-I-N
5) Major shout-out from DJT (in other words, still on good terms with POTUS)
6) Obsessed with symbols, numbers, and encoding

HighIQAnon was kind enough to include a PDF where he laid out his thoughts… and I suggest you read it, because on pages 5 and six, he points out that Anton was hired by Flynn, and makes some very interesting observations regarding the Q drops around the time of the state dinner with the Macrons.

No Title

No Description

And I’m going to add that last bit of evidence to the list:

1) His role in the White House
2) The use of pseudonyms in his work
3) Similar language
4) Literal “Baker” bringing the P-A-I-N
5) Major shout-out from DJT (in other words, still on good terms with POTUS)
6) Obsessed with symbols, numbers, and encoding
7) Hired directly by Flynn

And that’s where HighIQAnon wraps things up for us.

Amazing theory, isn’t it?

Now, some may get upset with me for “doxxing” Q here, but remember:

Firstly, I didn’t come up with this theory. It was already on the boards, so every bad actor in the world already read it hours ago.

Secondly, we’re not even sure if this is true, yet.

And Thirdly, if HighIQAnon is right, there’ve been enough public hints along these lines that none of this is really “secret” any more.

Now, personally, I find HighIQAnon’s line of thinking really compelling, which is why I presented it to everyone here, today, but I’m more than happy to be wrong about all of it.

If nothing else, I really like Michael Anton. He’s a smart guy, well worth paying attention to.

I’ll leave you with an excellent lecture Mr. Anton gave recently at Hillsdale College. Spend some time with it. You won’t regret it.


Thanks so much for reading and sharing my articles today!

Want to support my efforts with the site? One way you can do that is through the purchase of a shirt or an awesome QAnon Hat, which you can order in the Neon Revolt Shop! These hats are great, with 3D puff embroidery, and I’m working with great manufacturer to get these made and distributed. People love the hats when they get them.

Shirts are still available in the sidebar, too, naturally.

Thanks so much for your continued support through this wild ride we call Q!

Source: neonrevolt.com

Is this the True Face of #QAnon? #Q #GreatAwakening #NEONREVOLT